Some Known Questions About Dianetics.

I could not ever before not wish to get anything that comes to mind for you- if it was or else, I would not be resting right here with you, doing this. I not just could never have a problem, or otherwise intend to hear something that comes to mind for you, but I'm completely excited to understand every idea, every idea, every photo or sensation that emerges or materializes for you- do not ever think or else, and if for one reason or another you do, please just let me recognize! Sometimes, you may have a thought, and picture, concept or event appear that does not seem to respond to the question, or relate to it, but nevertheless, constantly do inform me regarding it, and as we proceed, the significance will certainly arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of processing, and the subject of this discussion: the standard functions of the counselor and the customer: The basic function of the therapist is, unlike "common training", not to manage, which means to impose and/or prevent, yet to rather work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.

In subjective processing, regardless of what was said in one's training products, the processor is not there "to control" the customer. As a matter of fact, the cpu is there to grant the customer the flexibility and undistracted emphasis to process and express what shows up, and what materializes is what arises when the customer deals with the product that connects to their own objectives for the processing, and for their life.

Dianetics - An Overview

John Mcmasters shared this basic reality wonderfully well in among his talks on Power processing, where he explains exactly how he was asked what this "unique flair" was that he had for providing such fantastic sessions; he needed to think of that for a moment, and found that it was what he had not been doing, as well as what he was doing: he wasn't reviewing, judging, computer, or as a matter of fact, producing any kind of ideas, let alone verbal expressions, after offering the command and while awaiting the PC to complete their response to their satisfaction; he was, just and only, existing with the computer, and entirely interested.




The role of the counselor, demonstrated; that was his "special knack". I have had my very own experience which taught me this well, very at an early stage in the game. In 1982, having recently completed my training and internship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was a factor in the session where (being get more a little bit damp behind the ears not yet having lots of hours under my belt as an expert auditor) the PC seemed to be "taking as well long" to reveal anything verbally after I gave him a command.


This secret became one of the most beneficial payment that John ever made to the subject of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my modest viewpoint, it is the best contribution that anybody has ever made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and without any type of idea, guidance or opinion.no preconceived agenda for individuals, or 'levels' that they should do


In Idenics, the only source of details concerning a customer is the specific customer. In Scientology we prided ourselves on not reviewing for individuals. However all that really suggested was that the auditor did not vocally assess for the computer in session. The registrars and values policemans assessed for the computer.

The Best Guide To Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is very evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we liquid chalked up the difference in results to John's improvisational abilities and experience. Upon more investigation, specific variables came to lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the various other professionals read the article weren't, but instead what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anybody that had actually ever seen John audit could not aid however see an one-of-a-kind high quality in his bookkeeping."The client's standard function is to be there with the objective of relocating the direction of their spiritual objectives, and to freely and totally express and experience whatever manifests for them in responding to the questions and carrying out the instructions in the processing.


This is something to procedure as required. Also, individuals regularly have previous experience and/or brainwashing in auditing/processing which, in some means, and to some levels, really misinforms them into perspectives, concepts and behavior patterns that protect against the full understanding of these roles, and so they will certainly have a tendency to prevent the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples provided over - Dianetics. * The initial, and maybe leading instances of mis-indoctrination causing much less than completely smooth and reliable sessions, can be discovered in specific elements of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are often an individual's very first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will go on to explain what I see as the problems in principle and practice, nevertheless, have a tendency to be significantly healing, done as they are offered (Hubbard firmly insists that "TR's are not refining, they are educating", yet factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made similar observations, and improved these with his "Existence Processes". There is no "failing", and no denial of the fact of this being processing. The focus, as it should be, gets on experiencing the other person's existence. All the indications which obtain a "flunk" in doing "TR-0" are simply the being's efforts to stand up to the various other individual's visibility, and instead of being harassed and badgered with "Flunk", which enforces "failing!" on the being, one just needs to be encouraged to "stick their feet in the water a little much deeper", to progressively rehabilitate their ability and readiness to totally share and experience "being below", or "presence", with her response others.

Dianetics Fundamentals Explained

I wait till the customer checks out me as if to say "I'm done answering, over to you, what's next?" As long as the customer is looking elsewhere than back at the therapist, they are still processing the question or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor invites itsa"; the customer is still refining, until their interest clearly goes back to the therapist.